Human Experience and AI Regulation: What European Union Law Brings to Digital Technology Ethics

Joanna J. Bryson, Weizenbaum Journal of the Digital Society, 3(3), 2023. 

Joseph Weizenbaum is famous for quitting AI after his secretary thought his chatbot, Eliza, understood her. But his ethical concerns went well beyond that, and concern not only potential abuse but also culpable lack of use of intelligent systems. Abuse includes making inhuman cruelty and acts of war more emotionally accessible to human operators or simply solving the problems necessary to make nuclear weapons, negligent lack of use of AI includes failing to solve the social issues of inequality and resource distribution. I was honoured to be asked for the Weizenbaum centenary to explain how the EU’s new digital regulations address his concerns. I first talk about whether Europe has legitimacy or capacity to do so, and then (concluding it might) I describe how the Digital Services Acts and the General Data Protection Regulation mostly do so, though I also spare some words for the Digital Markets Act (which addresses inequality) and the AI Act — which in theory helps by labelling all AI as AI. But Weizenbaum’s secretary knew Eliza was a chatbot, so the GDPR and DSA’s lines about transparency might be more important than that.

Read More
Going Nuclear?: Precedents and Options for the Transnational Governance of AI (pdf)

David Backovsky and Joanna Bryson, Horizons: Journal of International Relations and Sustainable Development , Issue 24, a special issue on AI and AI governance, Summer 2023.

We argue that the current global governance regime for AI is deeply dysfunctional. GPAI, OECD, UNESCO and ITU form a set of competing actors that do not presently provide us with the necessary legitimacy and centralization that would best serve global governance of AI. But we do have a history of technological governance we can learn from, and we know the basic structure of what an organization that can govern an emerging technology can look like. Regardless of the fact that nuclear and AI safeguards will never prove to be completely comparable, many core lessons from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) are straightforwardly applicable. We need a centralized agency, with political and technical capacity, with internal expertise and the right balance between accountability and political autonomy.

Read More
Do We Collaborate With What We Design?

Katie D. Evans, Scott A. Robbins, and Joanna J. Bryson, Topics in Cognitive Science, 2023. 

In this paper, we critically assess both the accuracy and desirability of using the term “collaboration” to describe interactions between humans and AI systems. We begin by proposing an alternative ontology of human–machine interaction, one which features not two equivalently autonomous agents, but rather one machine that exists in a relationship of heteronomy to one or more human agents. In this sense, while the machine may have a significant degree of independence concerning the means by which it achieves its ends, the ends themselves are always chosen by at least one human agent, whose interests may differ from those of the individuals interacting with the machine. We finally consider the motivations and risks inherent to the continued use of the term “collaboration,” exploring its strained relation to the concept of transparency, and consequences for the future of work.

Read More
2023ScienceSitesAI Ethics
The European Parliament’s AI Regulation: Should We Call It Progress?

Meeri Haataja and Joanna J. Bryson, Amicus Curiae, Series 2, 4(3), 707-718, Spring 2023.

We here describe the outcomes of the first round of legislative action by one of the EU’s two legislative bodies, the European Parliament, in terms of modifying the Artificial Intelligence Act. The Parliament has introduced a number of changes we consider to be enormously important, some in a very good way, and some in a very bad way. At stake is whether the AI Act really brings the power and strength of product law to continuously scale improved practice on products in the EU with intelligent components, or whether the law becomes window-dressing aimed only at attacking a few elite actors post hoc. We describe here the EU process, the changes and our recommendations.

Read More
Spamming the Regulator: Exploring a New Lobbying Strategy in EU Competition Procedures (pdf)

Marlene Jugl, William A.M. Pagel, Maria Camila Garcia Jimenez, Jean Pierre Salendres, William Lowe, Joanna J. Bryson, and Helena Malikova, Journal of Antitrust Enforcement, April 2023.

We document and examine a novel lobbying strategy in the context of competition regulation, a strategy that exploits the regulator’s finite administrative capacities. Companies with merger cases under scrutiny by the European Commission’s Directorate General for Competition appear to be employing a strategy of ‘spamming the regulator,’ through the strategic and cumulative submission of economic expert assessments. Procedural pressures may result in an undeservedly favorable assessment of the merger. Based on quantitative and qualitative analyses of an original dataset of all complex merger cases in the EU 2005–2020, we present evidence of this new strategy and a possible learning process among private actors. We suggest remedies to ensure regulatory effectiveness in the face of this novel strategy.

Read More
The (Most) Algorithmic Animal: Unknowable Causal Structures in the Information Age

Joanna J. Bryson, Journal for the Cognitive Science of Religion, 8(2), 115–121, November 2022.

Rituals are a means of regulation — they are a means for maintaining coherence and attaining long-term goals, including social coherence. But does their efficacy depend entirely, or at all, on their opacity? In this requested commentary on Harvey Whitehouse’s new book, The Ritual Animal, I discuss the utility of costly rituals in an evolutionary context, and suggest that causal opacity is only one, potentially substitutable cost. I relate this to the urgent topical concerns of polarization and of regulating sustainability globally.

Author’s final version, from July 2022.

Read More
2022ScienceSites
Belgian and Flemish Policy Makers’ Guide to AI Regulation

Joanna J. Bryson, KCDS-CiTiP Fellow Lectures Series: Towards an AI Regulator?, October 11, 2022.

The regulation of AI is of pressing national and international concern, yet often distracted by arguments concerning definitions and myths concerning the relevance of opacity to regulation. All software, and indeed all technological means of automating aspects of human industry and behaviour, are products of human action, and as such their production can be regulated to ensure sufficient transparency to hold their developer and operators accountable for mishaps. Indeed the processes necessary to ensure such transparency—including process audits—will reduce harms by encouraging compliance to ever-increasing standards of best practice. In this paper, I discuss social consequences of AI and digital technology, and both social and industrial benefits to coordinating their production through good governance.

Read More
Transnational Digital Governance and Its Impact on Artificial Intelligence

Mark Dempsey, Keegan McBride, Meeri Haataja, and Joanna J. Bryson, Handbook of AI Governance, May 2022.

This chapter explores the extant governance of AI and, in particular, what is arguably the most successful AI regulatory approach to date, that of the European Union. The chapter explores core definitional concepts, shared understandings, values, and approaches currently in play. It argues that not only are the Union’s regulations locally effective, but, due to the so-called “Brussels effect,” regulatory initiatives within the European Union also have a much broader global impact. As such, they warrant close consideration. Open access version.

Read More
Reflections on the EU’s AI Act and How We Could Make It Even Better (pdf)

Meeri Haataja and Joanna J. Bryson, CPI TechREG Chronicle, March 2022

Meeri Haataja and I wrote two papers (really, originally one long one) to inform the writing of the EU’s AI Act (AIA). Because of the importance of getting the material out to policy makers while they were still writing, we published in essentially a newsletter, who promised to publish the second part, a supplement about the costs in the next issue, then didn’t, so it’s just in arxiv for now. See What Costs Should We Expect From the EU’s AI Act?, SocArXiv, 2021

The main thrust of this article is that there is a lot of good work done in the AIA that some people with vested interests are unjustly attacking, but there are also a few things that can be improved. This may be interesting even if you don’t care about law in the EU, just if you are trying to regulate AI or the digital in your own country. See also my Wired article expanding on one aspect here: the definition of AI used in the AIA, and how that relates to the purpose of AI regulation.

Read More
Epidemic Modeling as a Means to Reimagine Health Education and Policy Post-COVID

Elise E. Racine and Joanna J. Bryson, Health Education, 11 November 2021.

My first summer at Hertie School I co-ran a small project with Slava Jankin on Agent Based Modelling (ABM) as (data) science in the context of public COVID policy. This paper is the sole published outcome, though see also the Webpage we put together on the project with the most useful links and papers we could find on the scientific application of ABM. This particular paper was primarily the work of the first author, who also extended it into her master’s dissertation at Hertie School.

Read More
2021ScienceSites
Two Solicited Chapters for the Collection The Love Makers

Coordinated by Aifric Campbell (2021)

Most of the book consists of her novella, Scarlett and Gurl, which I strongly, strongly recommend to everyone interested in the role of sentient-seeming AI in human society.

Read More
2022ScienceSites
Is There an AI Cold War? (pdf)

Joanna J. Bryson and Helena Malikova, Global Perspectives, 2(1), 2021.

Regulation is a means societies use to create the stability, public goods, and infrastructure they need to thrive securely. This policy brief is intended to both document and to address claims of a new AI cold war: a binary competition between the United States and China that is too important for other powers to either ignore or truly participate in directly, beyond taking sides.

Read More
Polarization Under Rising Inequality and Economic Decline

Alexander J. Stewart, Nolan McCarty, and Joanna J. Bryson, Science Advances, 6(50), Dec 2020.

This project came out of my work on cultural variation in public goods investment, crossed with getting asked on live TV whether AI was increasing inequality. I thought I’d better find out and went to talk by Nolan and learned about the correlation between inequality and polarization. I’ve been talking about this project for a couple years, but the model in the paper is entirely Alex. (I did replicate his work with an ABM, but that’s harder to analyze ... ). This has been my main research focus personally since 2016 and I’ve spoken about it a few times as a contribution to academic meetings, including EHBEA, APSA, and ICSD (well, Alex spoke about it there, I watched :-)

Read More
The Sustainability Game: AI Technology as an Intervention for Public Understanding of Cooperative Investment (pdf)

Andreas Theodorou, Bryn Bandt-Law and Joanna J. Bryson, to appear at the IEEE Conference on Games (CoG), August 2019.

This is the first paper unifying our transparency work, our games work, and our work on cultural variation in human cooperation and anti-social punishment. Hopefully there will be a bunch more in 2020 and 2021. Camera ready from July 2019 or so. Software on github, linked from the AmonI Software Page.

Read More
Improving Robot Transparency: An Investigation With Mobile Augmented Reality (pdf)

Alexandros Rotsidis, Andreas Theodorou, Joanna J. Bryson, and Robert H. Wortham, to be presented at RO-MAN 2019.

Authors’ final copy. Alex (with Andreas & Rob) got ABOD3 working on mobile phones so you can point your phone at a POSH / BOD robot and see what it’s trying to do. Software is probably available on github, just checking ...

Read More
The Past Decade and Future of AI’s Impact on Society

Joanna J. Bryson, a solicited and reviewed chapter in Towards a New Enlightenment? A Transcendent Decade, published by BBVA OpenMind, 2019.

This is a major policy document with my perspectives on how AI has been and should be incorporated into human society. It was originally written as a solicited white paper for the OECD on AI policy (May 2017), which I then revised to BBVA’s title (I’m almost the only person in the book who didn’t realise you could change the title). Final version submitted September 2018.

Read More
How Society Can Maintain Human-Centric Artificial Intelligence (pdf)

Joanna J. Bryson and Andreas Theodorou, solicited and reviewed chapter (title given) in the collection Human-Centered Digitalization and Services, Marja Toivonen-Noroand Eveliina Saari (eds.), Springer, 2019.

Includes justification, motivation, strategies for systems engineering of AI, and strategies for regulating it. tl;dr see the bullet-point version in my blogpost, A smart bureaucrat’s guide to AI regulation.

Read More
Emergent Biases in Compensatory Mutation Can Drive Gene Regulatory Network Evolution [Draft]

Yifei Wang, Marios Richards, Steve Dorus, Nicholas K. Priest, and Joanna J. Bryson, bioRxiv, 2019.

Not directly AI policy, about biological innovation. Basically, mutation really can be a factor of innovation, because compensating for things that go wrong is a lot easier than you thought. We’ve been working on this for years, it’s finally submitted somewhere — that fortunately encourages biorxiv use. See also my papers with Yifei below. Version from December 2019.

Read More
No One Should Trust AI

Joanna J. Bryson, an invited, reviewed, and edited blogpost by the United Nations University Centre for Policy Research, for their Artificial Intelligence and Global Governance blog series, 13 November 2018.

No one should trust AI because we ought to build it for accountability. Then we would have certain knowledge of who’s at fault, and trust isn’t needed, see the scientific trust paper just below with Paul Rauwolf as first author. Published November 2018.

Read More
Expectations of Fairness and Trust Co-Evolve in Environments of Partial Information

Paul Rauwolf & and Joanna J. Bryson, Dynamic Games and Applications, 8(4):891-917, 2018.

Highly relevant to information technology policy: The more you know, the less you need to trust, though if you know nothing or don’t have a choice of who you work with, people have no reason to be trustworthy. Trust comes with PARTIAL information, AND at least some freedom. Open access because Bath+Springer

Read More
Patiency Is Not a Virtue: The Design of Intelligent Systems and Systems of Ethics

Joanna J. Bryson, Ethics and Information Technology, 20(1):15-26, 2018.

Both AI and Ethics are artefacts, so there is no necessary position for AI artefacts in society, rather we need to decide what we should build and how we should treat what we build. So why build something to compete for the rights we already struggle to offer 8 billion people? Gold open access paid for by Bath out of our library budget. There are also older versions of this paper which was a discussion paper for a long time, but this is the archival version.

Read More
The Extended Ramp Model: A Biomimetic Model of Behaviour Arbitration for Lightweight Cognitive Architectures

Swen E. Gaudl and Joanna J. Bryson, Cognitive Systems Research, 50:1-9 (this journal seems to count issues as volumes), 2018.

Like the title says, an attempt to simplify and improve on the systems for representing emotions and drives I wrote with Emmanuel Tanguy and Phil Rolphshagen (the Dynamic Emotion Representation (DER) and Flexible Latching respectively, see below).

Read More
Communication (pdf)

Rob Wortham and Joanna J. Bryson, open access version, in Living Machines: A Handbook of Research in Biomimetic and Biohybrid Systems, Prescott and Verschure, eds, Oxford University Press, 2018.

A summary of everything biology and biological anthropology have to say on the subject, for the benefit of roboticists in particular. Open access is as of late November 2014, a lightly updated version is now available in the Handbook.

Read More
The Malicious Use of Artificial Intelligence: Forecasting, Prevention, and Mitigation

Miles Brundage, Shahar Avin, Jack Clark, Helen Toner, Peter Eckersley, Ben Garfinkel, Allan Dafoe, Paul Scharre, Thomas Zeitzoff, Bobby Filar, Hyrum Anderson, Heather Roff, Gregory C. Allen, Jacob Steinhardt, Carrick Flynn, Seán Ó hÉigeartaigh, Simon Beard, Haydn Belfield, Sebastian Farquhar, Clare Lyle, Rebecca Crootof, Owain Evans, Michael Page, Joanna Bryson, Roman Yampolskiy, Dario Amodei, a technical report apparently published by all seven of the Future of Humanity Institute, University of Oxford, Centre for the Study of Existential Risk, University of Cambridge, Center for a New American Security, Electronic Frontier Foundation, and OpenAI, 2018.

Apparently exactly one other author did even less than I did on this report; aside from turning up to the meeting I think my main contribution was insisting “use of” was in the title. Final (not peer reviewed except by the authors), February 2018.

Read More
Of, For, and By the People: The Legal Lacuna of Synthetic Persons

Joanna J. Bryson, Mihailis E. Diamantis, and Thomas D. Grant, Artificial Intelligence and Law, 25(3):273–291, Sep 2017.

Two professors of law and I argue that it would be a terrible, terrible idea to make something strictly AI (in contrast to an organisation also containing humans) a legal person. In fact, the only good thing about this is that it gives us a chance to think about where legal personhood has already been overextended (we give examples). “Gold” open access, not because I think it’s right to make universities or academics pay to do their work, but because Bath has some deal with Springer / has already been coerced into paying. Notice you can read below all my papers going back to 1993 (when I started academia); I don't think “green” open access is part of the war on science.

Read More
Semantics Derived Automatically From Language Corpora Contain Human Biases

Aylin Caliskan, Joanna J. Bryson, & Arvind Narayanan, Science, 356 (6334):183-186, 14 Apr 2017.

Be sure to also look at the supplement, which gives the stimuli and shows similar results for a different corpus and word-embedding model. Meaning really is no more or less than how a word is used, so AI absorbs true meaning, including prejudice. We demonstrate this empirically. This is an extension of my research programme into semantics originally deriving from my interest in the origins of human cognition, but now with help from the awesome researchers at Princeton I’ve merged this with my AI ethics work, and also managed to pitch for cognitive systems approaches to AI. Open access version: authors’ final copy of both the main article and the supplement (pdf).

Read More
Standardizing Ethical Design for Artificial Intelligence and Autonomous Systems

Joanna J. Bryson and Alan F.T. Winfield, IEEE Computer, 50(5):116-119, 2017.

What do you do when technology like AI changes faster than the law can keep up? One thing is have law enforce standards maintained by professional organisations, which are hopefully more agile and informed. Invited commentary. Open access version, authors’ final copy (pdf).

Read More
Improving Robot Transparency: Real-Time Visualisation of Robot AI Substantially Improves Understanding in Naive Observers

Robert H Wortham, Andreas Theodorou, Joanna J Bryson, in The 26th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, RO-MAN 2017.

What’s visualised is the system’s priorities (the upper part of a POSH plan hierarchy), and which priorities are active in real time. Extends the IJCAI ethics workshop results to direct interaction with robots, and for an archival conference.

Read More
The Meaning of the EPSRC Principles of Robotics

Joanna J. Bryson, Connection Science, 29(2):130-136, 2017.

In honour of the EPSRC Principles of Robotics’ fifth anniversary in 2016, Tony Prescott and Michael Szollosy ran an AISB symposium which was followed up by a special issue of the journal Connection Science the following year. I explain the principles' utility as policy, and their intent: to clarify that we are responsible for the AI we build and use. Open access version.

Read More
Designing and Implementing Transparency for Real Time Inspection of Autonomous Robots

Andreas Theodorou, Rob Wortham, and Joanna J. Bryson, Connection Science, 29(3):230-241, 2017.

In honour of the EPSRC Principles of Robotics' fifth anniversary in 2016, Tony Prescott and Michael Szollosy ran an AISB symposium which was followed up by a special issue of the journal Connection Science the following year. Open access version.

Read More
Principles of Robotics: Regulating Robots in the Real World

2016

In honour of the EPSRC Principles of Robotics' fifth anniversary in 2016, Tony Prescott and Michael Szollosy ran an AISB symposium which was followed up by a special issue of the journal Connection Science the following year. Here are the original EPSRC Principles of Robotics as they appear on the web pages of the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council's (EPSRC – the UK council for funding AI research). Tony got Alan Winfield to submit an article version of the Principles with the same authors, including me.

Read More
On the Reliability of Unreliable Information: Gossip as Cultural Memory

Dominic Mitchell, Joanna J. Bryson, Paul Rauwolf, and Gordon Ingram, Interaction Studies, 17:1 pp. 1–25, 2016.

There’s a tradeoff between how fast gossip spreads vs problems with its potential for corruption: it can be a lot more useful than direct experience if it spreads faster than that experience and there isn’t too much false information. Actually, in the real world gossip may give you more information than your perception, but that’s not one of the things we deal with here. This work was actually done prior to (and informed) our 2015 article Value Homophily Benefits Cooperation But Motivates Employing Incorrect Social Information, but took longer to get out for a few reasons. Open access draft.

Read More
A Role for Action Selection in Consciousness: An Investigation of a Second-Order Darwinian Mind

Robert H. Wortham and Joanna J. Bryson, in the CEUR Workshop Proceedings, published December 2016.

The title references my earlier paper, A Role for Consciousness in Action Selection in the International Journal of Machine Consciousness 4(2):471-482, which I’m not sure is well enough known to take the confusion of the joke, but this paper has a fun model of selection for metacognition, mostly by Rob.

Read More
Artificial Intelligence and Pro-Social Behaviour

Joanna J. Bryson, from the October 2015 Springer volume, Collective Agency and Cooperation in Natural and Artificial Systems: Explanation, Implementation and Simulation, derived from Catrin Misselhorn’s 2013 meeting, Collective Agency and Cooperation in Natural and Artificial Systems.

This brings together all three threads of my research: action selection, natural cognition and collective behaviour, and the mischaracterisation of AI as an active threat. In response to the apocalyptic futurism typified by Bostrom’s Superintelligence, I frame AI as an ordinary part of human culture, which for 10,000 years has included physical artefacts that enhance our cognitive capacities, and is apocalyptic enough in its own right. Open access: here’s the post-review submitted version from September 2014, or email me for the corrected final.

Read More
Recombination Is Surprisingly Constructive for Artificial Gene Regulatory Networks in the Context of Selection for Developmental Stability

Yifei Wang, Yinghong Lan, Daniel Weinreich, Nick Priest and Joanna J. Bryson, in the proceedings of The 13th European Conference on Artificial Life, July 20-24, 2015, York, UK.

The title says it all, except I think that I think we may be onto something really significant for machine learning as well as theoretical biology here.

Read More
2015ScienceSites
Value Homophily Benefits Cooperation But Motivates Employing Incorrect Social Information

Paul Rauwolf, Dominic Mitchell, and Joanna J. Bryson, Journal of Theoretical Biology, 367:246–261, 2015.

Preferring to cooperate with those with a similar cooperation style supports the evolution of cooperation. Reputations spread through gossip supports this strategy. But now that you are spreading two kinds of information (reputations of others, and your own style of cooperation) you can have a conundrum when these conflict. When there is such a conflict, signalling honestly about your cooperation strategy can be more beneficial to your community than telling the truth about someone else. Free open access draft is here. Software is coming soon. Draft is from October 2014, yet the work originally derived from On the Reliability of Unreliable Information: Gossip as Cultural Memory, which came out in 2016. Such is academia.

Read More
Learning from Play: Facilitating Character Design Through Genetic Programming and Human Mimicry

Swen E. Gaudl, Joseph Carter Osborn, and Joanna J. Bryson, from Progress in Artificial Intelligence: Proceedings of 17th Portuguese Conference on Artificial Intelligence, EPIA 2015, Coimbra, Portugal, September 8-11, 2015.

Also solving AI through social learning, this time game character strategies derived from human game traces. Open access camera ready version.

Read More
Understanding and Addressing Cultural Variation in Costly Antisocial Punishment (pdf)

Joanna J. Bryson, James Mitchell, Simon T. Powers, and Karolina Sylwester, in Applied Evolutionary Anthropology: Darwinian Approaches to Contemporary World Issues, Gibson & Lawson (eds.), Springer, 2014.

This book follows from a workshop. Here is a free version of the chapter, the revised draft from May 2013. See further our Cultural Variation in Costly Punishment project page. Note: Google Scholar managed to find a USAF white paper derived from our final report by the same title which has a lot of irrelevant detail and a couple theoretical errors we’ve since discovered. The book chapter is 15 months more recent.

Read More
Evolving Evolvability in the Context of Environmental Change: A Gene Regulatory Network (GRN) Approach

Yifei Wang, Stephen G. Matthews and Joanna J. Bryson, Artificial Life 2014.

Interesting for both biology & machine learning, looks at the role of a potentially-hierarchical network representation in the genome for handling semi-predictable environmental change. Final version is open access, because computer science has archival conferences.

Read More
The Extended Ramp Goal Module: Low-Cost Behaviour Arbitration for Real-Time Controllers based on Biological Models of Dopamine Cells

Swen E. Gaudl and Joanna J. Bryson, from the IEEE Conference on Computational Intelligence and Games (CIG) 26-29 August 2014 in Dortmund.

Swen Gaudl has been working on improving the emotional / durative action selection work I started with Emmanuel Tanguy (see below.) Swen’s published two papers on his new Extended Ramp Goal (ERGo) model. See also: A Biomimetic Model of Behaviour Arbitration for Lightweight Cognitive Architectures, Swen E. Gaudl and Joanna J. Bryson, to appear in Philosophy and Computers, a newsletter of the American Philosophical Association (Peter Boltuc, ed.).

Read More
2014ScienceSites
The Role of Stability in Cultural Evolution: Innovation and Conformity in Implicit Knowledge Discovery

Joanna J. Bryson, book chapter in Perspectives on Culture and Agent-Based Simulations, Virginia and Frank Dignum, (eds), Springer, Berlin 2014.

Some simple simulations of culture and modularity showing interesting stability effects, inspired by a talk Dan Sperber gave in 2008. Open access draft from 2010. Open source netlogo model described in the paper on the AmonI Software Page.

Read More
The Conceptualisation of Emotion Qualia: Semantic Clustering of Emotional Tweets

Eugene Y. Bann and Joanna J. Bryson, in Proceedings of the Thirteenth Neural Computation and Psychology Workshop (NCPW) which actually took place in July 2012, but finally got published in 2014 (Julien Mayor, ed.).

A chapter length description of our attempt to use social media as a source for a more accurate portrayal of the space of human emotions. Derived from Eugene Bann’s undergraduate dissertation. A more recent paper by the same authors on a related topic came out in 2013 ...

Read More
Measuring Cultural Relativity of Emotional Valence and Arousal using Semantic Clustering and Twitter

Eugene Y. Bann and Joanna J. Bryson, Proceedings of Cognitive Science, 2013.

Considers the most common “emotion” keywords on Twitter, and discovers that some concepts, e.g. sleepiness and sadness, are relatively culturally invariant, but others like “surprise” and “stressed” seem to be used quite differently in different global regions. Also, Europeans are the most positive and excited tweeters. Camera-ready from April 2013.

Read More
The Role for Simulations in Theory Construction for the Social Sciences: Case Studies Concerning Divergent Modes of Religiosity

Harvey Whitehouse, Ken Kahn, Michael E. Hochberg, and Joanna J. Bryson, Religion, Brain & Behaviour, 2(3):182-224 (including commentaries and response), 2012.

I’m particularly pleased about this paper because it shows clearly how models can advance even well-established social-scientific theories provided that we work directly with domain experts who really understand the theory and data. There are some very pithy, quotable text about this in our response to commentaries, From the Imaginary to the Real: The Back and Forth Between Reality and Simulation. Open access pre-proof version of the target article, and of the response to commentaries. Associated software is available from the AmonI software page, and also in the electronic appendix. Oxford Anthropology have made a web page about our simulation of religion work.

Read More
Punishment Can Promote Defection in Group-Structured Populations

Simon T. Powers, Daniel J. Taylor and Joanna J. Bryson, The Journal of Theoretical Biology, 311:107-116, 2012.

Penultimate version on arXiv. This paper shows that punishment alone can’t explain altruism, the papers that thought it could didn’t take into account the well-documented behaviour of anti-social punishment. Basically, some people punish those that contribute to the public good. This is the first article of at least five we expect to publish explaining this phenomenon, and why it varies by culture. See our Cultural Variation in Costly Punishment project page.

Read More
Patiency Is Not a Virtue: Suggestions for Co-Constructing an Ethical Framework Including Intelligent Artefacts

Joanna Bryson, appeared in The Machine Question: AI, Ethics and Moral Responsibility, (Gunkel, Bryson and Torrance, eds, see above), pp. 73-75, 2012, but there’s a nice new version now, see 2016.

Argues that both ethical systems and robots are artefacts of our society, so we have a good deal of control over whether we choose to make our agents moral subjects. Doing so would be a displacement of responsibility that currently rests in us, and that displacement probably isn’t justified or advisable. There are newer, better versions of this paper in 2018.

Read More
2012ScienceSites
Structuring Intelligence: The Role of Hierarchy, Modularity and Learning in Generating Intelligent Behaviour (pdf)

Joanna J. Bryson, from McFarland, D., Stenning, K. and McGonigle-Chalmers, M. (eds.) The Complex Mind, on Palgrave MacMillan, 2012.

An invited chapter for a book written in honour of the late Brendan McGonigle. The chapter mostly takes a neuro and psychological approach, but last section is Eco Evo Devo, with some ideas I’ve been working on lately on the origins of cognition. This is the draft sent to the publisher in March 2010.

Read More
Agent-Based Models as Scientific Methodology: A Case Study Analysing the DomWorld Theory of Primate Social Structure and Female Dominance (pdf)

Joanna J. Bryson, Yasushi Ando & Hagen Lehmann, from Modelling Natural Action Selection (Seth, Prescott & Bryson eds.), CUP, 2011.

The discussion is updated from our 2007 PTRS-B article, though the models are not. Penultimate draft from 2010, related (including improved) software is available here.

Read More
Flexible Latching: A Biologically-Inspired Mechanism for Improving the Management of Homeostatic Goals

Philipp Rohlfshagen and Joanna J. Bryson, Cognitive Computation, 2(3):230-241, 2010.

Discusses a simple add-on mechanism for dynamic plans to allow sensible ordering of high-level drives, and explains why this problem is different from detailed action selection. Lots of experiments, some maths and some discussion of the literature on cognitive control in natural and artificial intelligence. Associated software comes with the standard python/jython distribution of BOD.

Read More
Crude, Cheesy, Second-Rate Consciousness (pdf)

Joanna J. Bryson, from the proceedings of Brain Inspired Cognitive Systems (BICS) 2010.

This is an update of the AISB update of the Vienna Consciousness paper. The next step should be a journal article. The title is a reference to a Dennett quote well worth knowing. The paper claims we already have conscious robots and it’s not that big of a deal. It also puts forward some cool ideas about the functional role of the action-selection-related process that we experience as consciousness.

Read More
Cultural Ratcheting Results Primarily from Semantic Compression (pdf)

Joanna J. Bryson, from The Proceedings of Evolution of Language 2010, Smith, Schouwstra, de Boer & Smith (eds.) pp. 50-57.

Discriminates the size of a culture (how much information can be transmitted from one generation to the next) from its extent (how much useful behaviour can be generated) and argues that the vast majority of cultural ratcheting is because the size of human culture finally got large enough that cultural evolution could start increasing its extent.

Read More
Age-Related Inhibition and Learning Effects: Evidence from Transitive Performance (pdf)

Joanna Bryson, in Proceedings of the 31st Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (CogSci 2009) pp. 3040-3045.

The paper is a scientific consequence of the ideas put forward in “Crude, Cheesy, Second-Rate Consciousness” (see below), and the work I am doing on understanding the evolution of cognition. It concerns the tradeoffs between individual and genetic learning, and whether these may be shifted on the basis of individual experience over an agent’s life history. Evidence is derived from models of macaque task learning. Camera ready from April 2009. Associated software comes with the standard lisp distribution of BOD.

Read More
Embodiment vs. Memetics

Joanna J. Bryson, in Mind & Society, 7(1):77-94, May 2008.

Discusses the importance of the discovery that human-like semantics can be learned simply from observing large corpora, with ramifications for the evolution of language. The final version is from November 2007, here is a penultimate draft (pdf) from August for those who do not subscribe, although it has a couple gaffs in it.

Read More
The Impact of Durative State on Action Selection (pdf)

Joanna J. Bryson, appeared in Emotion, Personality, and Social Behavior at the AAAI 2008 Spring Symposia at Stanford in March.

This is a somewhat pedantic overview of the improvements we’ve made to BOD, POSH and of course AI action selection in general in the last three years, with an eye to pleasing the EPSRC since my grant with the same title just ran out. Final version from January 2008.

Read More
Agent-Based Models as Scientific Methodology: A Case Study Analysing Primate Social Behaviour

Joanna J Bryson, Ando Yasushi and Hagen Lehmann, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society - B, Biology, 362(1485):1685-1698, 2007.

This paper talks about how ABM fits in as a part of scientific methodology, and in particular analyzes as a case study the macaque social structure simulation in Hemelrijk’s DomWorld. The DomWorld link includes the associated software. An earlier version of this paper with the predictions and not the full analysis appears under 2005 below (Lehmann et al). Green open access draft.

Read More
Introduction. Modelling Natural Action Selection

Tony J. Prescott, Joanna J. Bryson and Anil K. Seth, associated introductory article to the above special issue, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, B – Biology, 2007.

This is actually quite a substantial article which covers the concept of action selection far more thoroughly than any other article in the two issues. I strongly recommend reading it. Written in April 2006.

Read More
Representations for Action Selection Learning from Real-Time Observation of Task Experts (pdf)

Mark Wood and Joanna J. Bryson, in IJCAI 2007, presented in Hyderabad in January 2007.

This paper expands on the COIL system (presented first and more completely in the IEEE journal article) for imitation learning, showing how adding solid Bayesian representations improves both performance and extendibility. Final version from October 2006.

Read More
Emotions as Durative Dynamic State for Action Selection (pdf)

Emmanuel A. R. Tanguy, Phil J. Willis and Joanna J. Bryson, in IJCAI 2007, presented in Hyderabad in January 2007.

The 6-page version of the AI part of Emmanuel’s PhD on the Dynamic Emotion Representation, which may more generally be useful for selection problems that fall between long-term potentiation (learning) and nerve-cell firing (acting). Associated software.

Read More
Skill Acquisition Through Program-Level Imitation in a Real-Time Domain

Mark Wood and Joanna J. Bryson, IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics, 37(2):272-285, 2007.

This paper presents an imitation learning system called COIL (inspired by Deb Roy’s CELL) capable of learning tasks in a dynamic real-time environment (Unreal Tournament). If you don’t subscribe to IEEE, here is a draft from May 2006. An even older version is Bath Technical report CSBU-2005-16.

Read More
Agent Based Modelling of Communication Costs: Why Information Can Be Free (pdf)

Ivana Cace and Joanna J. Bryson, in Emergence of Communication and Language on Springer, edited by Caroline Lyon, Chrystopher L. Nehaniv and Angelo Cangelosi, 2007.

Shows that the tendency to communicate information can be adaptive even though it has immediate costs to the communicators and there are free riders / information hoarders around the place. A chapter-length extension of Cace & Bryson ’05. Version from early March 2006.

Read More
A Dynamic Emotion Representation Model Within a Facial Animation System (pdf)

Emmanuel A. R. Tanguy, Phil J. Willis, and Joanna J. Bryson, The International Journal of Humanoid Robotics, 3(3):293-300., 2006

This paper presents a Dynamic Emotion Representation (DER) model, its implementation and an instance of a full humanoid emotional model built with it. Penultimate draft version from May or June 2006. A longer version (which I think is more interesting though some terminology is wrong) is also a Bath technical report CSBU-2005-14, from November 2005

Read More
The Attentional Spotlight (pdf)

Joanna J. Bryson, from Minds and Machines, 16(1):21-28, 2006.

Jon Dorbolo wanted someone to write about Dan Dennett and Cog, and apparently Dennett suggested me! This isn’t the usual kind of thing I write — it’s mostly anecdotes and amateur philosophy — but people like it. Talks about Cog’s first years, modular AI, philosophy of science, being a grad student, and a bit about memetics. Written in May 2005.

Read More
Why Information Can Be Free (pdf)

Ivana Cace and Joanna J. Bryson, Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on the Emergence and Evolution of Linguistic Communication (EELC'05).

Shows that the tendency to communicate information can be adaptive even though it has immediate costs to the communicators and there are free riders / information hoarders around the place. Updated 16 January 2005. Extended in 2006, see above.

Read More
2005ScienceSites
Now for the Tricky Bit ...

(Originally “Consciousness Is Easy, but Learning Is Hard”) Joanna Bryson, invited article for The Philosopher's Magazine 28(4):70-72, 2004

Explains that everything with RAM has functional self awareness, video cameras have perfect memory, what makes us intelligent (and is computationally difficult) is generalising from experience, which involves forgetting / unconsciousness. PDF wanted … but you can get the first third of the article from the link.

Read More
Where Should Complexity Go? Cooperation in Complex Agents with Minimal Communication (pdf)

Joanna J. Bryson, in the proceedings of the First GSFC/JPL Workshop on Radical Agent Concepts (WRAC), 2003.

Discusses when to use communication between agents in a multi-agent system vs. when to use behavior arbitration between modules in a modular single agent. Shows code from the primate colony simulation I’m working on with Jessica Flack. Final version is © Springer-Verlag. Updated 3 July 2002.

Read More
Semantic Web Services as Behavior-Oriented Agents (pdf)

David Martin, Sheila I. McIlraith, Lynn Andrea Stein and Joanna J. Bryson, 2002.

We wrote two versions of the same paper. This is the shorter and somewhat cleaner one. IEEE Computer rewrote this a bit into something called Toward Behavioral Intelligence in the Semantic Web for a special issue. More technical details are in a Springer chapter which can be found above under 2003. Both the book and the IEEE Computer special issue are about Web Intelligence, and edited by Ning Zhong, Jiming Liu, and Yiyu Yao. The papers recommend that the semantic web be viewed as containing intelligence, not just information. They also provide recommendations for altering the DAML-S spec. to better support this. Read about it in Russian. Updated 25 July, 12 October & 7 July 2002, respectively.

Read More
2002ScienceSites
Embodiment vs. Memetics: Does Language Need a Physical Plant?

Joanna J. Bryson, from the Proceedings of the Workshop on Developmental Embodied Cognition (DECO 01).

I describe my model of how language connects to modular embodied intelligence in nature, and what this implies for AI. Just a position/review paper, no novel results, but good fun. Updated October, 2001. Er ... my revisions were made far too late to make the proceedings, but the original (pdf) isn’t very clear! There is now an even more revised version, see 2007.

Read More
2001ScienceSites
Intelligence by Design (pdf)

PhD Dissertation: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, 2001.

Joanna Joy Bryson (postscript version). Warning: that version is 344 pages long, due to 140 pages of lisp code. I have broken the dissertation into its main text, code appendices and bibliography, (all in postscript), in the likely event you just want to read the text. You can also email me to ask for a copy of the printed Tech Report, which is paperback-like and doesn’t have the code. The files above are from the TR, which is clearer than the submitted dissertation (pdf). I also have had the Intelligence by Design Thesis Defense materials online since just after that 30 April 2001 defense.

Read More
Dragons, Bats & Evil Knights: A Three-Layer Design Approach to Character Based Creative Play

Joanna Bryson and Kris Thórisson. Final version appeared in Virtual Reality, 5(2):57-71, a special issue on Intelligent Virtual Agents edited by Daniel Ballin, 2000.

Article concerns the design of constructive narratives. Describes SoL (a hybrid architecture composed of Edmund and Ymir), a slightly modified form of BOD to support SoL, and our experiences developing AI for constructive narratives at LEGO. Draft version from 18 Dec. 2000.

Read More
Modularity and Specialized Learning: Mapping Between Agent Architectures and Brain Organization (pdf)

Joanna Bryson and Lynn Andrea Stein (postscript version), from the proceedings of EmerNet2000 (Emerging computational neural network architectures based on neuroscience). Final version is © Springer-Verlag.

Discusses the relationship between agent architectures and neuroscience, and proposes a model for an agent capable of developing its own behavior / skill modules as well as learning new patterns of behavior. Target audience is neuroscientists and computer scientists interested in expanding neural networks to exploit modularity and specialized learning. Updated 3 December 2000.

Read More
2000ScienceSites
Modularity and Specialized Learning in the Organization of Behavior (pdf)

Joanna Bryson and Lynn Andrea Stein (postscript), presented at NCPW6 in September 2000, in the proceedings. Final version is © Springer-Verlag.

Summary: This chapter is similar to the EMERNET one just above, but shorter (10 vs 15 pages) and focuses on my BOD systems rather than agent architectures in general. Targeted for psychologists and cognitive scientists who use neural networks to model human behavior. Updated 30 October 2000.

Read More
2000ScienceSites
Architectures and Idioms: Making Progress in Agent Design (pdf)

Joanna Bryson and Lynn Andrea Stein (postscript), presented at ATAL 2000, now a book chapter, the final version is © Springer-Verlag, 2000.

Summary: discusses the importance of methodology and the utility of alternative architectures — among other contributions, it distinguishes between these. Also gives a good one-page summary of what reactive planning really is. We suggest that the most useful thing to do with a new architecture is to identify its contributions and then express them in terms of one or more main-stream architectures. An extended example is made of an idiom we call a Basic Reactive Plan, taken from my architecture, Edmund, among other places. Updated 29 October 2000.

Read More
Agent Development Tools

Joanna Bryson, Keith Decker, Scott DeLoach, Michael Huhns and Michael Wooldridge, also at ATAL, 2000.

This is a synopsis of a panel discussion, with a fine two-page rant from me I still stand by. There’s a free version on Scott DeLoach’s publications page.

Read More
2000ScienceSites
Hierarchy and Sequence vs. Full Parallelism in Reactive Action Selection Architectures (postscript)

Joanna Bryson, in The Sixth International Conference on the Simulation of Adaptive Behavior (SAB2000) (Note: there’s a pdf version with an extra blank page.)

Summary: demonstrates that hierarchy does not necessarily lead to a reduction of performance, even in highly dynamic environments. An illustration (with statistical evaluation) of the importance of clean design approaches to creating good AI systems. A shorter, less clear version of this paper appeared in Intelligent Virtual Agents 2, 1999. Final version; published in August 2000.

Read More
The Study of Sequential and Hierarchical Organisation of Behaviour via Artificial Mechanisms of Action Selection (pdf)

Joanna Joy Bryson, MPhil Dissertation: University of Edinburgh, Faculty of Social Sciences (Department of Psychology), 2000.

That is the 173-page 11-point 1.5-spaced PDF version, with a little source code my examiners asked for. There’s also a 94-page 10-point single-spaced compressed postscript version with no source code. Complete source code is available at the bottom of this page. Summary: gives evidence for the need for structured control from three sources: the history of AI agent architectures, my experiments in two domains (robotics and artificial life), and a review of the neurological / behavioral literature. Also discusses the dialect differences between Psychology and AI, and AI as a research tool for Psychology. Final corrections, January 2000.

Read More
Creativity by Design: A Character Based Approach to Creating Creative Play (pdf)

Joanna Bryson, in the AISB Symposium on AI and Creativity in Entertainment in April 1999.

Summary: another proto-BOD paper, talks about combining Edmund with another agent architecture, Ymir, in the context of virtual reality characters. More about SoL, Ymir and the project is in the “Dragons, Bats & Evil Knights” paper above; some of the technical details of implementing Edmund’s POSH architecture in SoL are in “Architectures and Idioms” paper also above.

Read More
Agent Architecture as Object Oriented Design (postscript)

Joanna Bryson and Brendan McGonigle, presented in Agent Theories, Architectures and Languages 1997, and published in Intelligent Agents IV by Springer in 1998.

Summary: a proto-BOD paper, this describes developing behaviors and control scripts in a way similar to developing object hierarchies in OOD. Also mentions the way I have localized learning in the behavior libraries.

Read More
The Design of Learning for an Artifact (postscript)

Joanna Bryson, from the AISB96 workshop on Learning in Robots and Animals. (There's also an older, longer version about Cog.)

Learning in animals seems to be highly specialized and constrained as much as possible, primarily to things that cannot be learned in evolutionary time scales. As developers of behavior-based AI, we largely take on the role of evolutionary learning ourselves. Our robots or avatars should only have the special-purpose sorts of learning built-in to their everyday actions.

Read More
The Use of State in Intelligent Control (postscript) [Draft]

Joanna Bryson, 1995.

This short paper compares Shakey and Genghis, and demonstrates the necessity of using control state even in the simplest reactive system. I’m not sure anyone cares enough for me to ever get this one published! But I still think it could be useful for some people. (The original Genghis didn’t actually back up and turn when it bumped into something with a feeler. It just lifted its leg higher. Ooops. Oh well, the same arguments still all apply. The behavior I described was on the commercial version of Genghis available then from ISR (now iRobot)).

Read More
The Reactive Accompanist: Applying Subsumption Architecture to Software Design

Edinburgh University Department of AI tech report 606, 1992.

This paper is temporarily (January 2003) inaccessible due to the Edinburgh fire. Since ‘temporary’ has lasted for over two years, here’s a draft version I still had the latex for. Compares Subsumption Architecture with Object-Oriented Design in the context of my MSc. Draft was last modified around November 1992, it was placed here March 2005.

Read More